Kiobel and the Surprising Death of Universal Jurisdiction Under the Alien Tort Statute, 107 AM. J. INT’L L. 835 (2013).
The People’s Republic of China and the Enforcement of ICSID Awards, 6 CONTEMPORARY ASIA ARBITRATION JOURNAL 31 (Spring 2013).
Globalization and Sovereignty, 31 BERKELEY JOURNAL OF INT’L L. 210 (2013) (with John Yoo).
China and the Future of International Adjudication, 25 MARYLAND J. INT’L L. 154 (2012).
The Limits of Corporate Rights Under International Law, 12 CHI. J. INT’L L 729 (2012).
Globalization and Structure, 53 WM. & MARY L. REV. 431 (2011) (with John Yoo).
The Curious Case of Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute, 51 VA. J. INT’L L. 353 (2010).
“The Future of Presidential Power Will Resemble the Past,” WHITE HOUSE STUDIES (2010).
Unitary Executive Theory and Exclusive Presidential Powers, 12 U. PENN. J. CONST. L. 615 (2010) (symposium essay).
How System Criminality Could Exacerbate the Weaknesses of International Criminal Law, 8 SANTA CLARA J. OF INT’L L. 365 (2010) (symposium essay).
The Wrongheaded and Dangerous Campaign to Criminalize Good Faith Legal Advice, 42 CASE W. RES. J. INT’LL. 449 (2009) (symposium essay).
The Prospects for the Peaceful Co-existence of Constitutional and International Law, 119 YALE L. J. ONLINE 15 (2009)
Medellin’s Clear Statement Rule: A Solution for International Delegations, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 609 (2008) (symposium essay)
The Crucial Role of the States and Private International Law Treaties: A Model for Accommodating Globalization, 73 MO. L. REV. 1063 (2008) (symposium essay)
Sanchez- Llamas v. Oregon: Stepping Back from the New World Court Order, 11 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 17 (2007) (symposium essay)
Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?, 84 WASH.U. LAW REV. (2007)
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: The Functional Case for Foreign Affairs Deference to the Executive Branch, 23 CONST. COMMENT. 179 (Summer 2006)
Gubernatorial Foreign Policy, 115 YALE L. J. 2380 (forthcoming 2006) (symposium article)
Ali v. Rumsfeld: Challenging the President's Power to Interpret Customary International Law, 38 CASE WESTERN RES. INT'L L. J. 371 (2006) (symposium essay)
International Delegations and the New World Court Order, 81 WASH. L. REV. 1 (2006).
Structural Conflicts in Judicial Interpretations of Customary International Law, 45 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 101 (2005).
The Third Wave: The Alien Tort Statute and the War on Terrorism, 19 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 205 (2005).
Beyond Formalism in Foreign Affairs: A Functional Approach to the Alien Tort Statute, 2004 SUP. CT. REV. 153 (with John Yoo).
Treaties as Laws: A Defense of the Last in Time Rule, 80 IND. L. J. 319 (2005).
The State of New York Does Exist: How States Control Compliance with International Law, 82 N.C. L. REV. 457 (2004).
Customary International Law in State Courts, 42 VA. J. INT'L L. 265 (2001).
The Delegation of Federal Powers to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions, 85 MINN. L. REV. 71 (2000).
"Why Constitutional Rights Litigation Should Not Follow the Flag", National Security Law Report, Volume 28, No. 2 (July 2006).
"Is There an Exclusive Commander-in-Chief Power?," YALE L. J. (THE POCKET PART), March 2006
"Treaties Shouldn't Trump Law," Houston Chronicle (March 11, 2006)
"Treaties Shouldn't Trump U.S. Law," Los Angeles Times B13 (March 8, 2006)
Writ, FINDLAW.COM, "Choosing Between Constitutional and International Law: Why the U.S. Had Good Reason to Ignore the Recent World Court Order," February 11, 2003.